Transaction Details
The contract call From 0x5D802e2F...4456f1F16 To 0xcC268835...50F0f6Ed5 produced 1 Internal Transaction
Type Trace Address | From | To | Value | Gas Limit | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
call_0_1_1_1_1_1 | Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy | ZorBase: Deployer | 0.00123982798640195 ETH | 13,454 |
Transaction Receipt Event Logs
-
Address
- 0x6f3e6272a167e8accb32072d08e0957f9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy
Name
VoteCast (index_topic_1 address voter, uint256 proposalId, uint8 support, uint256 votes, string reason)View Source
Topics
- 0 0xb8e138887d0aa13bab447e82de9d5c1777041ecd21ca36ba824ff1e6c07ddda4
- 1: voter 0xcC2688350d29623E2A0844Cc8885F9050F0f6Ed5
Data
- proposalId :661
- support :1
- votes :37
- reason :Nouncil has spoken. We discuss all Nouns proposals every week in our Discord https://discord.gg/fdjJpMeV6K. The calls are public and all are welcome! You can find a link to previous call recordings in our Discord "links" channel. Nouncil has voted For this proposal, with 23 votes for, 22 against, and 2 abstentions. Thanks for playing Nouns. **FOR - 23 VOTES** **jesscas** | *"Looks like this won't pass in this version throwing a vote in support of an iterated version"* **benbodhi** | *"I'm voting yes for this. Klim has delivered awesome products and has done a lot on his own dime. I use the recent zeroweight prop as a comparison and feel like this is just as worthy. I also want to see what else comes from Klim and nounworks."* **AGAINST - 22 VOTES** **borg00000** | *"Is unclear to me what has been funded vs what hasn't - seems dao has covered activations eg trips to nouns town, Japan, and your previous trips and exhibitions via many large proposals. Feel like the noun retro reward makes obvious sense to me tho. The $75k without clear budget break downs for reimbursement makes less sense to me - also if this is the funding you told Chris you needed then would prefer the prop just come from you as opposed to if Chris spontaneously wanted to gift you usd/a noun in which case no need to justify anything on your part. Else would be open to funding you $75k to explore new things but this framing not making sense to me rn."* **sqx.pcc** | *"I am an against in this format because it appears to downplay all the funding that was received. storage IMO should not be funded . it was a trade. it went south. dump the inventory. a more accurate description of money in vs cost I would be in favor of. I am supportive of Klims support for ⌐◨-◨. but this proposal feels misguided based on lack of funding received numbers."* **ABSTAINS - 2 VOTES**
-
Address
- 0x6f3e6272a167e8accb32072d08e0957f9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy
Name
VoteCastWithClientId (index_topic_1 address voter, index_topic_2 uint256 proposalId, index_topic_3 uint32 clientId)View Source
Topics
- 0 0x651cc9d78606507fdcfc4f37ec37a744d612b1d8f5a73564190577c4f0edb0b6
- 1: voter 0xcC2688350d29623E2A0844Cc8885F9050F0f6Ed5
- 2: proposalId 661
- 3: clientId 6
Data
- 0x
-
Address
- 0x6f3e6272a167e8accb32072d08e0957f9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy
Name
RefundableVote (index_topic_1 address voter, uint256 refundAmount, bool refundSent)View Source
Topics
- 0 0xfabef36fd46c4c3a6ad676521be5367a4dfdbf3faa68d8e826003b1752d68f4f
- 1: voter 0x5D802e2Fe48392c104Ce0401C7ECa8a4456f1F16
Data
- refundAmount :1239827986401950
- refundSent :True
Name
ExecutionSuccess (bytes32 txHash, uint256 payment)View Source
Topics
- 0 0x442e715f626346e8c54381002da614f62bee8d27386535b2521ec8540898556e
Data
- txHash :6643E8ECD4B374DC573FA365609D749E1E893C7335D465693E7104AD3E8FB5B8
- payment :0
A transaction is a cryptographically signed instruction that changes the blockchain state. Block explorers track the details of all transactions in the network. Learn more about transactions in our Knowledge Base.