ETH Price: $2,810.20 (-0.38%)
Gas: 1.45 Gwei

Transaction Details

Transaction Hash:
0x25862e6917656f5beeeb509f6e0885f27534187bb90dab6e6c0819b38908ab09
Status:
Success
Block:
21030272750498 Block Confirmations
Timestamp:
104 days ago (Oct-23-2024 07:06:23 PM UTC)

Transaction Action:
Call Cast Refundable Vote With Reason Function by ENS Nameripe0x.eth on Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy

Sponsored:

From:
To:
0x6f3E6272A167e8AcCb32072d08E0957F9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy)
Transfer0.002407300889084865 ETHFrom
Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy
To
ENS Nameripe0x.eth

Value:
0 ETH ($0.00)
Transaction Fee:
0.003564657427973395 ETH $10.02
Gas Price:
17.795081935 Gwei (0.000000017795081935 ETH)
Ether Price:
$2,522.33 / ETH
Gas Limit & Usage by Txn:
298,539 | 200,317 (67.1%)
Gas Fees:
Base: 16.340081935 Gwei |Max: 24.921492899 Gwei |Max Priority: 1.455 Gwei
Burnt & Txn Savings Fees:
🔥 Burnt: 0.003273196192973395 ETH ($9.20)💸 Txn Savings: 0.001427541265075588 ETH ($4.01)

Other Attributes:
Txn Type: 2 (EIP-1559) Nonce: 1123 Position In Block: 30
Input Data:

Private Note:
To access the Private Note feature, you must be Logged In

The contract call From 0xCB43078C...5faE217F9 To 0x6f3E6272...F9c79223d produced 1 Internal Transaction

ADVANCED MODE:
Type Trace Address From   To Value Gas Limit
call_0_1_1_1Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO ProxyENS Nameripe0x.eth0.002407300889084865 ETH92,251
AA Txn Hash Method Position From Internal Txns Token Txns NFT Txns Txn Fee (ETH) Gas Limit
Transaction Receipt Event Logs
38
Address
0x6f3e6272a167e8accb32072d08e0957f9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy)
Name

VoteCast (index_topic_1 address voter, uint256 proposalId, uint8 support, uint256 votes, string reason)View Source

Topics
Data
  • proposalId :661
  • support :0
  • votes :1
  • reason : +1 > Klim is a wonderful contributor to this community, but we simply can't set the precedent that arbitrary self-directed unaccountable spending will be refunded by the DAO (even if it produces good results). > > I would personally support an actual retro funding proposal that focuses exclusively on Klim's contributions (not his expenses) and gifts 3-5 Nouns, as well as cash compensation that offsets the tax obligation. +1 > I struggle with this proposal. > > Not because I don’t want to support Klim. I’ve supported him as much as possible throughout the last 2 years and still want to support him in the future. Klim makes world-class products. I also believe that we should hold each other to a minimum standard in proposals by providing at least equal parts of story vs actual figures. > > I struggle with this proposal because it’s trying to convey a narrative and personal feeling as hard facts. But there’s no evidence offered. > > “Klim has self-funded a vast majority of his work.”
> Honestly, I’m really not sure about this. I’m not going to do the math for you. It’s the proposers job to at least make it easy to validate / verify. > > Why is there not a single mention of the funding Klim received?
> The proposal makes it look like all the pins, fun noggles, and nounish friends, etc. were self-funded. > > Additionally, how the proposal is written makes it unclear in which category this funding belongs? > > Is this a retroactive fund for doing things out of scope?
> What was in- vs out of scope? What were the experiments that went well that we could consider retroactively funding? What are the success stories? > > Or is this a retroactive reward for your work? Fair enough if it is. Present some eye candy images, clips and highlight metrics. Job done. > > Or is this a proposal for future projects?
> “With retroactive funding, he will be able to scale Nounish products, attend more global events, and continue creating memorable physical experiences that bring Nouns to life.”
> If it’s not, you’re just postponing whatever issue is prominent now into the future. > > What’s also a bit concerning is for anyone asking about the actual financial impact, they're hit with answers ranging from (paraphrasing) “I’m not good with spreadsheets” to “I don’t have access to my files because of the hurricanes.”
> —> Is this a disaster relief? > Fair enough if it is. If that's case, say it. Because if it’s not, I’d rather have Chris and Klim spend more time working out the delta between (funding received + revenue) - spending. Even if it turns out to be 4x the amount of this ask, at least there would be clarity, and we can collectively rip off the bandaid. > > There’s a certain scent of resentment in the on-chain air with a flavor of “it’s never enough” - it’s either not enough funding, not enough support, not enough distribution, not enough coordination, not enough consumers or not enough collaboration, etc. never enough. > > Parts of me wish this proposal would simply pass - and I think it will - so we can get over it, move on and see this sentiment evaporate. But it doesn't appear that anybody actually knows if this will be enough. > > There are many good reasons for different types of retros: Klim does great work! (!!!) and delivers many tokens of joy! I'm sure if numbers are properly addressed, that there is a reasonable and appropriate ask for retro funding some of the activities too. > > As it stands now, I highly disagree with how this precedent is being presented without sharing the full picture.

39
Address
0x6f3e6272a167e8accb32072d08e0957f9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy)
Name

VoteCastWithClientId (index_topic_1 address voter, index_topic_2 uint256 proposalId, index_topic_3 uint32 clientId)View Source

Topics
Data
    0x

40
Address
0x6f3e6272a167e8accb32072d08e0957f9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy)
Name

RefundableVote (index_topic_1 address voter, uint256 refundAmount, bool refundSent)View Source

Topics
Data
  • refundAmount :2407300889084865
  • refundSent :True

                
Loading...
Loading
Loading...
Loading
Loading...
Loading

A transaction is a cryptographically signed instruction that changes the blockchain state. Block explorers track the details of all transactions in the network. Learn more about transactions in our Knowledge Base.