ETH Price: $3,353.77 (+0.55%)

Transaction Details

Transaction Hash:
0x2b8680629ccef25dbb5437f10ced7bc1d7c204ee4374a94e99024005c6be4354
Status:
Success
Block:
193639192162355 Block Confirmations
Timestamp:
302 days ago (Mar-04-2024 07:33:59 PM UTC)

Transaction Action:
Call Cast Refundable Vote With Reason Function by ENS Namenbaronia.eth on Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy

Sponsored:

From:
To:
0x6f3E6272A167e8AcCb32072d08E0957F9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy)
Transfer0.011144696797247614 ETHFrom
Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy
To
ENS Namenbaronia.eth

Value:
0 ETH ($0.00)
Transaction Fee:
0.014112550151807176 ETH $47.33
Gas Price:
104.608697422 Gwei (0.000000104608697422 ETH)
Ether Price:
$3,631.85 / ETH
Gas Limit & Usage by Txn:
262,972 | 134,908 (51.3%)
Gas Fees:
Base: 104.607757422 Gwei |Max: 111.221480619 Gwei |Max Priority: 0.00094 Gwei
Burnt & Txn Savings Fees:
🔥 Burnt: 0.014112423338287176 ETH ($47.33)💸 Txn Savings: 0.000892117355540876 ETH ($2.99)

Other Attributes:
Txn Type: 2 (EIP-1559) Nonce: 847 Position In Block: 281
Input Data:

Private Note:
To access the Private Note feature, you must be Logged In

The contract call From 0xe3D73DAa...07cC1A436 To 0x6f3E6272...F9c79223d produced 1 Internal Transaction

ADVANCED MODE:
Type Trace Address From   To Value Gas Limit
call_0_1_1_1Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO ProxyENS Namenbaronia.eth0.011144696797247614 ETH121,613
AA Txn Hash Method Position From Internal Txns Token Txns NFT Txns Txn Fee (ETH) Gas Limit
Transaction Receipt Event Logs
704
Address
0x6f3e6272a167e8accb32072d08e0957f9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy)
Name

VoteCast (index_topic_1 address voter, uint256 proposalId, uint8 support, uint256 votes, string reason)View Source

Topics
Data
  • proposalId :509
  • support :0
  • votes :3
  • reason :"Top tier teams’ opportunity cost is far greater than Nouns’ current offer." I disagree with this take, both for this proposal, and broadly towards other proposals. I think we as Nouns should choose to work with proposers/organizations (and proposers/orgs in turn should work with us) if we are broadly aligned in pursuing "nounish" proposals, however broadly one chooses to define "nounish". Proposers should certainly be fairly compensated for their labor (and maybe even achieve further alignment with some form of "upside"), but I think there are better uses of our funds than spending it on optimizooooors who are weighing nouns' compensation against other projects. Nouns is such a compelling cryptonative project not because of the size of our treasury or ability to finance projects, but rather due to our idiosyncratic culture, and I think if either we or proposal recipients begin to make decisions on the basis of financial calculus that's pretty frownish. I'm not suggesting that seneca is suggesting that in this prop, but I want to etch my reasoning on chain for future discourse. FWIW, I am a huge fan of farcaster and huge supporter of farcaster related proposals for nounish proliferation. I'd love to first see how the existing tranche materializes before we make a decision on how to titrate the size or frequency of future farcaster X nouns proposals, but would definitely support a prop similar to this in the future.

705
Address
0x6f3e6272a167e8accb32072d08e0957f9c79223d (Nouns DAO: Nouns DAO Proxy)
Name

RefundableVote (index_topic_1 address voter, uint256 refundAmount, bool refundSent)View Source

Topics
Data
  • refundAmount :11144696797247614
  • refundSent :True

                
Loading...
Loading
Loading...
Loading
Loading...
Loading

A transaction is a cryptographically signed instruction that changes the blockchain state. Block explorers track the details of all transactions in the network. Learn more about transactions in our Knowledge Base.