Transaction Details
Status:
Success
Block:
197806712005988 Block Confirmations
Timestamp:
280 days ago (May-02-2024 06:32:23 AM UTC)|Confirmed within 9 secs
Transaction Action:
Sponsored:
From:
Value:
0 ETH ($0.00)
Transaction Fee:
0.000313488508729584 ETH $0.89
Gas Price:
7.243934484 Gwei (0.000000007243934484 ETH)
Ether Price:
$2,986.41 / ETH
Gas Limit & Usage by Txn:
48,018
|
43,276 (90.12%)
Gas Fees:
Base: 7.193499249 Gwei |Max: 8.12930145 Gwei |Max Priority: 0.050435235 Gwei
Burnt & Txn Savings Fees:
🔥 Burnt: 0.000311305873499724 ETH ($0.88)💸 Txn Savings: 0.000038315140820616 ETH ($0.11)
Other Attributes:
Txn Type: 2 (EIP-1559)
Nonce: 901
Position In Block: 80
Input Data:
More Details:
Click to show more
Click to show less
Private Note:
To access the Private Note feature, you must be Logged In
AA Txn Hash | Method | Position | From | Internal Txns | Token Txns | NFT Txns | Txn Fee (ETH) | Gas Limit |
---|
Transaction Receipt Event Logs
235
Name
FeedbackSent (index_topic_1 address msgSender, uint256 proposalId, uint8 support, string reason)View Source
Topics
- 0 0x66777d398af2d3ad91be043f4ee15e0058fd64a2badd9977e29334dc608bbfa6
- 1: msgSender 0xA86882277E69FbF0a51805cdc8b0a3a113079E63
Data
- proposalId :533
- support :2
- reason :I understand the hesitation here but i think this is exactly the (ballpark) precedent we want to set in order to keep trait quality high. "Is this trait good enough to earn a noun?" i believe is a healthy framework and starting point for the dao when it comes to voting on ad-hoc trait proposals. +1 > I think it's cute but giving a noun in exchange for submitting a trait feels like it's offering a lot. I don't think there should be a precedent that adding a trait earns you a noun
Loading...
Loading
Loading...
Loading
Loading...
Loading
A transaction is a cryptographically signed instruction that changes the blockchain state. Block explorers track the details of all transactions in the network. Learn more about transactions in our Knowledge Base.